The aim of this anonymous questionnaire was to elucidate the opinion of the
participants about the importance and quality of the workshop as well as of
the project in general.
The questionnaire was completed by 15 participants.
|
№ |
Subject of evaluation |
Evaluation grade |
||||||||||
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
||
|
1 |
Representation of potential stakeholders at the
workshop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Х
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Importance of issues discussed at the workshop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Х |
|
|
3 |
Quality of presentations made by experts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Х
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Level of activity and constructivenes of the discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Х
|
|
|
|
5 |
Importance of the adopted list of sustainable development
issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Х
|
|
|
|
6 |
How realistic are the adopted issues of the future
programme? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Х
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Duration of the workshop (5-optimal, 10-too long,
1- too short) |
|
|
|
|
Х
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Quality of organisation of the workshop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Х |
|
The additional comments/wishes:
- to invite to the future
discussion practical foresters as well as foresters-researchers (expressed
by 1 person);
- to include into the Programme
the study of forest biocenoses (expressed by the same person);
- to envisage realistic financing
of the Programme (expressed by one person).